Wednesday, August 15, 2007

A "really" Happy Independence Day

According to The Guardian, “India is the best place in the world to be born right now”
. Somewhere else in the British press, they were busy celebrating "the arrival of a golden (Indian) age".

OK, let us come out of our anglophilistic [or, westophillistic would be more appropriate :)] mindsets (which makes us respect an Amartya sen, only when and once they have been recognized by the west). So even if we ignore what Guardian commented - we know that India is now THE HAPPENING THING, indicated by numerous things which our medias, both electronic and print, have been enlightening us about all these days preceding the independence day and beyond.

But not only that - We, I, can also feel it as an individual. Parents of most of us would perhaps had never dreamt that we would be sitting in AC offices, doing nothing [most of the time :)], earning paid vacations to Europe / US [and if u r in TCS, Uruguay / Nicaragua and may be arctic / antarctic, and may be moon too :)], (some of us) would earn so much money in a month that it took the parents a lifetime to save, would fly, would drive cars [and other than ambassadors / premier padminis / marutis :) ].


So many factors combined to give us this lifestyle, this progress, this 'giant leap in human development index' - like technological advancements (mobile and internet come immediately to mind), but these revolution in technology had thrown an opportunity to the entire world - not just India.

The reason why Indians could tap it, where as most of the rest of the developing world could not, or being more correct, politically and otherwise, why India could tap it more than the rest of the world, is - we had few people, few visionaries, which rest of the world did not. This blog entry, on 60th ID of India, is a tribute to those people.
Here they are:


Nehru
Praising him now a days is one of the most politically incorrect things in here (unfortunately). But it was his vision of what he called 'the temples of modern India', which created, among other things, the IITs, perhaps our most valuable & respected brand name in US (and the developed world) today. I need not waste time, yours and mine, commenting upon the IITs :), but let me share a conversation I had with an American colleague outside our office building (somewhere north of DC), where I was waiting for a friend and he was taking a smoking break - we started talking casually and he was curious about where I graduated from. Upon me mentioning one of the IITs*, his comment was: "O man, IITs!!! ppl who don't get admission there come here and study at MIT" - [M for Massachusetts, not for Manipal, mind u :)]

Rajiv Gandhi
His name here may be surprising to most of u. Cause almost nothing has been written about his visions (or, whatever has been written, got over shadowed by bofors / shahbano / shilanyas etc ). Anyway, i think it was 1986, when i read an interview he gave to some kids (i think on the occasion of 14th nov), for a children's hindi monthly called Parag. At that time, very few things (toffees, biscuits, summer vacations and daadi's stories) made sense, and this interview was definitely not one of them. It was not till i finished BE and joined Wipro and till terms like information revolution started appearing in the media, and grew familiar to me, and to most of India, that i recalled one of his comments from that interview.
Rajiv to kids: "aap logon ne parha ho ga ki qareeb 200 saal pahle duniya mein ek audyogik kranti aayee thhee. par ham us mein peeche rah gaye the. Dunia me ek aur kraanti aane vaali hai, 'soochna kranti', aur is baar hamein peeche nahi rahna hai."
And then he went on to mention that he was working towards bringing computer technology to India - so that this time India wont fall behind.

Apparently, it hasn't.
Thanks to him, (and i m sure many others too).

Also, he added, with things like these, he wanted to take India to 21st century ...
How prophetic words, and whatta vision ...
It is his vision that we (particularly the IT people) are living today.

Narsimha Rao / Manmoahn singh
The architects of economic liberalization that swept (and continues to seep) India (well, at least the urban middle class and beyond), off its feet, catapulted it to the forefront of world stage. Somehow, i feel this jodi was not given the credit that it deserved, neither in India, nor in the world. This jodi was to India what Deng was to china, and perhaps more - cause unlike Deng, they were working in a democracy. While Deng is universally recognized as the man who put China in the big league, this jodi is not as much recognized as it deserved to be (it is just my observation, and it may be wrong - i hope i am)

PS: Read India as "urban India" - for, unfortunately, rural India, like most of the rest of the world, could not tap this opportunity in such a big way - which should be and is a cause of concern, but let us celebrate what we have achieved, instead of feeling guilty over what we should have but not - achieved. Also, the still existing poverty in rural (and urban as well) India, and other things associated with it, are not 'because of the progress of Urban Middle class India' - it is indifferent of it. And though indifference is questionable and should be corrected, it is not objectionable - i guess.

So Happy Independence Day guys (and gals) - and salute to those who are responsible for the most of the "Happy" part of the above greeting.

Shadkam Islam
http://shadkam.islam.googlepages.com/
http://shadkamislam.blogspot.com/
http://shadkam19.blogspot.com/

* though my college became an IIT after my passing out - i took the liberty to not to bother him with all those details :)

5 comments:

Sambaran said...

I liked your comment about nehru. Nowadays, you are deemed stupid if you do not call nehru stupid. Yes nehru was idealistic and stupid, we lost to china.. remember? However if nehru was not idealistic and stupid, he could have easily made india an autocracy in those heady days where congress used to win 500+ seats. I personally consider that as the singlemost important contribution of nehru.

Shaad, I tried hard but could not disagree with a single line of yours. Great post.

Can you write about your take on "Why India remains a unified nation?". As I think about it, I find it mindboggling that india is not disintegrating. May be it will but that it has not disintegrated in past 60 years puzzles me, makes me feel proud. But I do not understand why... So shad, consider this as readers request.

Anonymous said...

Hi Shad,

Thanks for the mail and the post is really a good read. Keep them coming. I however have a few points.

I was probably a tad too ignorant when the IT revolution was nascent. Until I joined engineering I had no clue where I was heading. It has been one of the major reasons for the kind of lifestyle we have come to take for granted.

I especially like the way wealth has trickled down although a lot of people would disagree with me on this. But I choose to look at the taxi/cab industry, the PVRs, the malls, the boiled peanuts that sell at 10 rupees in Koramangala :)) Wealth indeed has trickled down. Hopefully, we're still a little far from digressing from our savings mindset. That in all likelihood will stay for some years.

Is there a reason why you chose to ignore the czars of IT revolution - The Premjis, the NRNs?

Although on the one hand I agree that IITs are the best things to have happened to India, but there's a gross neglect for primary education. If you look at the most successful nations (in terms of intellectual capital), the education scene is bottom up. A strong primary education system that builds up to an advanced system for higher studies. In India, for some odd reason, Nehru emphasized a lot more on IITs than he did on basic education.Some of the states in India have IITs but boast of a pathetic literacy percentage. Isn't that a paradox? I personally would not give a lot of credit to Nehru. (In my humble opinion)

I share your views on Rajiv Gandhi. If not for a lot of controversies that bogged him down, his charisma would have been a good thing for India. It is a pity he didn't live long enough :) Ditto on PVN and Manmohan Singh. Although both get perceived as puppet prime ministers - PVN riding on the huge Rajiv Gandhi sympathy wave and Singh riding on Sonia's supreme sacrifice - they have done enough to prove their mettle.

Keep writing :)
Cheers,
Chaitra
http://chaitrasuresh.livejournal.com/

Anonymous said...

First, thanks for "PS: Read India as "urban India" because that helped me to erase the doubt as I was reading through the post (had Shadkam forgotten about the mass below the poverty line).

As far as comments are concerned, I would like to be little more (on certain key notes of the post) augmentative rather than critical.

Anglophilistic: Is this inculcated through urbanisation ? If YES, then I AM AGAINST THE MOTION. Reason being : if you go through pages of history over the last century, some of the greatest stalwarts of the Indian society got recognition in India, ONLY after being recognized by the World around. This behaviorial trait appears to be there right from the Day One and is NOT the effect of urbanisation (so called influenced by Westerners). Lets take some instances
Subhas Chandra Bose: Being awarded postumous Bharat Ratna (highest Civilian Award) a year before his centenary. An event which was well deserved to be RK Laxman's cartoon theme.
Dr. Subhas Mukherjee: First test tube baby (the news never reached the world since India banned his research) Unfortunately the worldwide recognition goes to Louis Browne.After 25 years Dr. Mukherjee received his due recognition from ICMR and NAMS(ONLY AFTER British Medical Council celebrated the silver jubilee of his Research)
Satyajit Ray: Being awared Bharat Ratna, post Lifetime Oscar award.
To top the list Vivekananda: getting garlanded and applauded at Chicago made his countrymen realise "Oh shit, what a blunder we made, he should have got the recognition here first"

There are some more key notes to touch upon, shall do it once my status is "NOT WORKING in NETRWORKING"

Anonymous said...

I personally feel the IITs are over-rated a lot. How many patents are registered in the name of IIT students or faculties (not after moving out)? How many bleeding-edge research projects have they done? Which technology developed in an IIT has been adopted on a significant scale by any organization? I cant even begin the count. I personally feel a university's true contribution should be measured in terms of what problems it solved for people, instead of how successful the students of that university have been.
True, IIT'ans have achieved a lot. But it has more to do with the Indian psyche that places huge importance on education since ages.
Apart from IITs, there are hundreds of other universities in India, where the standards are pathetic, and yet students from these institutes go on to make huge success stories after moving to the US. And dont forget, most of the IIT'ans have been successful only after moving to the US and pursuing a masters/doctorate in some US university.
Narsimharav/Manmohan in my opinion, were simply forced to do what they did, I doubt it was of their own volition that they opened up the economy.

Anonymous said...

Nice post. My comments:

1. I have reservations about attributing credit to the Gandhi clan for the current progress. While they may have had some successes here and there, India's potential is still largely untapped due to the policies followed by them. Since they have been in power so long they have to take much of the blame for most of the ills that plague Indian goverment machinery: corrruption, incompetence, lack of entrepreneurship, government tyranny...Nehru and Indira will ofcourse have to take much of the blame for that. Rajiv just had too little impact but can take some credit for the kicking off the computer age, kickstarting telecom and attracting talent like Manmohan Singh. Nehru could be appreciated for his idealistic views but nothing more.

2. There is a glut of feel good articles about India in the media right now. They threaten to drown out the discussion that is more important. That is, what needs to be done. My top concerns would be:
a. Distribution of wealth
b. Security, adherence to law, police and judicial system.
c. Planned development. Will the cities be able to cope with the growth that they are seeing? Are we managing our water resources wisely and preparing for the water scarcity that is looming? Why do I hear no voices in India to improve public transport so that fewer cars pollute the cities? With such a shortage of land and pollution problems in India I would have expected it to be a model of innovative reduction of traffic. But all I see is a mad rush for more. More houses, more cars, more everything. India has an opportunity to learn from the mistakes of earlier industrialized nations and build a systems with more respect for the earth's resources, more wholesome well-being rather than just material luxuries and build an identity rather than just the next big market.
d. I won't even go into corruption, work culture and our historical social problems.


I think the euphoria over India's development is understandable but premature. Just riding the good times will take us some place because India is fovourably placed at the moment. But the real success story will make India a heaven to live in for one and all. At the moment all I can see though is a chaotic economic boom at the end of which India will have a bigger rich-poor divide, more congested cities, more crime, loss of the India's soul.

But of course, I would rather be surprised!

Shiladitya